Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree?
Technology nowadays are on each steps of your foot which has changes the current scenario of the world. Multitude of people think working at home only benefits employee, not the employees. I totally agree to this statement, because in terms of pros both are identical.
For employers one of the most cardinal income is, they do not need to purchase highly qualified storied building for workers these investment are dead assets for companies. By saving huge amount of money employers can give other accommodation to there workers for better consequence. Another important advantage is, using remote desktop technology an employee can rectify any critical issue without any hustle. Such advance system is a boom for customers and service provider because despite of the fact that they reside in the two extreme corners of the world, they can communicate an resolve any cumbersome technical glitch.
However as compare to past few years people are highly connected with automation world. One of the most advantage for employee can save there time which later on can be utilize with their family, they get flexible working hours at home. Another forth coming is, workers do not need to inhale highly flammable toxic from vehicles, which keep there body disease free. Adding to it they can also save there life from danger. For instance, survey show that most of the death are due to accidents of vehicles.
Speculating aforementioned views it can be comment that big corporate as well as there personnels are equally benefited by the latests technology advestment, that is capable of catering highly effective with minnale inputs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | nirav malaviya | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | nirav malaviya | 56 | view |
- More and more people are using computer and other electronic devices to access information So printing of books magazine and newspaper should be done Discuss both view and give your opinion 90
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 56
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 78
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 78
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do agree or disagree 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this investment' or 'these investments'?
Suggestion: this investment; these investments
... qualified storied building for workers these investment are dead assets for companies. By savin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ners of the world, they can communicate an resolve any cumbersome technical glitch...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e any cumbersome technical glitch. However as compare to past few years people are...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'latests'' or 'latest's'?
Suggestion: latests'; latest's
...personnels are equally benefited by the latests technology advestment, that is capable ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30543933054 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62167198277 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661087866109 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1408058728 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189253078298 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739759745439 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804440958289 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118504323309 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534837685725 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.