Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.

Government officials should base their decisions on their own judgment and while making those decisions they should not carry out the will of the people they serve.

The demand of mankind has no boundary: it never ends. Sometimes those demand of one person contradicts with the demands of others, and hence while serving mass people there must be strict rules and regulations and where rules-regulations are not enough, judgment of the official serving those people must be applied. For example, in a public hospital patients come with various problems. Every person thinks their problem is more severe and they should get priority. However, from neutral point of view there are some people who truly deserves attention before others. So, in that case if the officials consider the will of the people they serve there will be a chaos and the environment of the hospital will be disturbed. Strong rules and regulations can solve the problem, however, there are some times where rules and regulations are not enough and in that circumstances the judgment of the official is necessary. It makes sense that, a patient with a severe heart attack should not be kept in long line and deserves emergency attentions from the hospital officials.

Passport offices, where people of each and every class of society gathers, require a long procedure which are some times onerous for old citizens. There are also some people who do not know anything about the procedures of the office. However, all of them want that their work must be done first. On that case though there may be regulations of serial maintaining, official can consider the condition of the old people by using there moral judgment and may serve them first.

In a ticker counter of railways, long lines are commonplace. However, there may be a passenger whose train is going to leave the station and though he is way behind official must serve him considering his emergency. But, it is also true all of the passengers will then demand that they also have emergency and they should be served first but it is the duty of the officials to keep the environment under control and persuade the other passengers using his judgment.

Though it is true that sometimes poor judgment of the officials may create chaos and may disrupt the system, it is the duty of the government to ensure that the person it is employing has strong judgment capability and should arrange a test which will measure the judgment capability of the officials before appointing them.

Government officials must use their own judgment while serving and should not pay attention to the will of the people they serve.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 DH123 50 view
2019-11-16 ghazalsaed1995 75 view
2019-11-07 seonjungkim 58 view
2019-11-06 sudesh tiwari 58 view
2019-09-24 Lutfor Rahman Rony 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Lutfor Rahman Rony :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ing his emergency. But, it is also true all of the passengers will then demand that they a...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94606741573 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54822344921 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431460674157 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1037186051 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.277777778 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7222222222 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426709532325 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140316322198 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161347680003 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30357187302 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190803801418 0.0667264976115 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.