This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The bar chart compares the number of British couples who recently got married in different eight honeymoon destinations including Spain, Paris, Thailand, The Lake District, The Maldives, The Greek Islands, Bali, and Costa Rica in 2010.
Overall, Thailand was the number-one honeymoon destination for honeymooners while the quantity of newlywed British couples who chose The Lake District was the lowest.
Thailand, The Maldives, Bali and Costa Rica were the four destinations where attracted a lot of couples. Particularly, the most domineering category was Thailand where appealed 1410 couples who recently started a family. This was followed by Bali, with 1335 couples spending their honeymoon there. Besides, roughly 750 of newlywed couples indicated they preferred visiting Costa Rica, compared with fewer couples who chose The Maldives for their honeymoon, with 600 couples.
In stark contrast, Spain, Paris, The Lake District, and The Greek Island were less popular destinations for honeymooners. The Greek Island was twice as popular as Paris where appealed to 432 and 209 of couples respectively. Specially, only under 150 newlywed British couples decided to visit Spain and Thailand as their honeymoon destinations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 67
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 89
- It is shown that meetings, training and discussions now happen online. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages? 89
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70652173913 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77833826523 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0573984352 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261211050012 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114768915065 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614074930863 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176537233769 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266409437286 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.