Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The present turbulence in the world economics often deter Governments from making capital investments in fields that are not economically profitable. Any wise Government will prefer to invest in and fund for improvements in education, science and technology, research and development and inter-country trade relations that will eventually boost the country’s economy. But a wiser Government will ensure a holistic development approach for its state. A wealthy nation, flourishing in resources, utilization of technology and trade relations, may still fall back in its competition if it has an underdeveloped passion for arts.
To the common man, art, though important, isn’t a necessity. It is understood and appreciated mainly by a section of people having a creative bend of mind. Art mainly caters to the aesthetic realms of the human brain, often acquiring a place much inferior to rational and practical aspects of daily life. Since time immemorial, art has been used in a fashion to deliver visual and auditory pleasures, temporarily freeing man from the mundane everyday life. Over the years, art has evolved both in forms and types. The approach towards arts saw a paradigm shift in the Renaissance period, which gave way to modern forms, with digitization gradually taking over in the last centuries. Music, drama, theatre, literature, dance and architecture have all witnessed a dramatic modernization in its life cycle today. New arts evolve and the old forms slowly dwindle away due to lack of funds and interests of people. And with these, we slowly and gradually lose our rich cultural heritage.
Thus, Government initiative to fund arts is of prime importance for it to flourish. Firstly, it must also encourage students to take up arts in their school academics. Setting up of museums, new and modern schools and colleges, catering solely to the various aspects of development of art and culture, will be the next step. Sufficient funds and scholarships must be provided to the students and teachers to help them pursue careers in arts. The Government should set up more exhibits, encourage the investors to sponsor, involve the general multitude to participate and encourage cross-cultural or cross-border exchange of arts and must ensure that the skills and synergy of the people pursuing arts are invested properly. These people involved in arts can also be given the responsibility of beautification of cities, parks, highways, riverbanks, airport terminals and much more. The highly artistic Bird’s Nest Olympics stadium had received much appreciation from all over the world for its highly intrigued aesthetic sense.
The Government must also ensure that the indigenous art forms of the native inhabitants of any place should be given importance to. Lack of publicity, dearth of funds and unwillingness of people to invest money in the native culture, which is often viewed as recessive, have resulted in the shrinking markets for the indigenous arts. Innovating newer ways to bring this indigenous art forms to spotlight can well become a source of income for the native inhabitants. Had the West Bengal Government invested more on the idol-making artists in Kumartuli, providing them with better shelters for their idols, subsidized raw materials and a wider market, this indigenous art form would have flourished even more than what it is today.
On the contrary, there are every possibility of creative art forms getting polluted with the availability of more money. If paintings can fetch large amounts of easy cash, fake artists will grow in numbers and forgery will indubitably set in. Literature and music will be pirated and artifacts will be counterfeited. Funding can stagnate arts instead of encouraging diversity.
The government must ensure that the funds supplied are utilized in a manner to help various arts, mainly the sinking or newly emerging, develop and reach out to the general people for appreciation. Else, an uncontrolled investment will threaten the integrity and honesty with which people pursue this artistic career. Art will stand to lose its wholesomeness, creativity and beauty, and will be oriented more towards business and profit-making schemes.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 59
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 37
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 11.1786427146 322% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 55.5748502994 155% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3579.0 2260.96107784 158% => OK
No of words: 664.0 441.139720559 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39006024096 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07623851424 4.56307096286 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98339344225 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 353.0 204.123752495 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531626506024 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 1111.5 705.55239521 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.38857157 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.451612903 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4193548387 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38709677419 5.70786347227 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.20758483034 244% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348136200577 0.218282227539 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927236363648 0.0743258471296 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606198278603 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183633922856 0.128457276422 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528197347617 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 194.0 98.500998004 197% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.