Nations should pass a law to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas can be developed for economic gain.
The statement "nations should pass the law to keep any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even these areas could be developed for economic gain, because due to pas decade nations change dramatically for their economic gain, everyone is in the race for the technological growth and economic increase and power for the wealth of the country/nation and this leads to depleting of wilderness rapidly and from this point of view and recent increase in global warming nations should pass the law for preserving the wilderness in its natural state.
As per the recent surveys wilderness use to cover quarter of the earth surface and most of the marine or aquatic life and it's been disturbed by human race to technology and economic growth and further leads to many more circumstances like increase in pollution, global warming, climate change, ozone layer depletion and many more which is bad for earth and its lifestyle and most probably going to affect us. So for the respect and care for our upcoming generation should pass the law for preserving wilderness at its best state and even try to gain in the place as they were.
Even if the country can gain economy or is gaining we should take steps to change the policies to save and preserve the wilderness because it's a global issue and it is gonna effect us in coming future though it doesn't matter about economic growth.
Human and nations are being cruel to wildlife and its span and this is effecting us now, so better start preserving now or it's going to be too late for us and circumstances will be much worse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | mrnba10222@gmail.com | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'surveys'' or 'survey's'?
Suggestion: surveys'; survey's
...s natural state. As per the recent surveys wilderness use to cover quarter of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... As per the recent surveys wilderness use to cover quarter of the earth surface a...
^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ave and preserve the wilderness because its a global issue and it is gonna effect u...
^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...na effect us in coming future though it doesnt matter about economic growth. Huma...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 124, Rule ID: IT_IS[19]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... now, so better start preserving now or its going to be too late for us and circums...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81454545455 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56244717744 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 23.0359550562 239% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 149.207774596 60.3974514979 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 264.8 118.986275619 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.0 23.4991977007 234% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.21951772744 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496142581267 0.243740707755 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248055673241 0.0831039109588 298% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205720405417 0.0758088955206 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274401820736 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206620828109 0.0667264976115 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.7 14.1392134831 203% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 48.8420337079 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 12.1743820225 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.8971910112 248% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 11.2143820225 214% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.7820224719 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.