The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The graph illustrates the growth of local products on average in prosperous countries. The data projected on this bar chart indicates countries that implemented globalization methods for business, and also the countries which have chosen other paths.
Generally, the percentage of Gross Domestic Product is decaying gradually over these 40 years. However, globalization is following the opposite trend and is becoming more and more common in these countries. Furthermore, the percentage of other countries which are pursuing other strategies is not following a specific trend.
Back in the 60s and 70s, most countries were not familiar with globalization plans. As a result, most countries were following other methods back then. Countries that supported globalization were approximately at 1.5 percent in the 60s and slightly less than 3 percent in the 70s. On the other hand, non-globalizers were nearly at 2.4 percent and above 3 percent in the 60s and 70s respectively. The percentage of rich countries dropped significantly from 4.6 percent to near 3 percent.
In recent decades, non-globalization methods gave their position to globalization approaches which faced an incredible increase from around 3 percent in the 80s to nearly 5 percent in the 90s. But, in the 80s, the other plans dwindled to 0.9 percent then gained 0.5 percent afterward and finished up at 1.4 percent in the 90s. Also, the average GDP of the affluent countries didn't vary noticeably in the last two decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | GulmiraKusajynkyzy | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.to what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans. 56
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e average GDP of the affluent countries didnt vary noticeably in the last two decades...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3686440678 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12102375587 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555084745763 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2615598093 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228670969885 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922617260472 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626561646901 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156978026804 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960891024737 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.