The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph represents the amount of chicken , beef , lamb and fish that was consumed by each person every week in a european country from 1979 to 2004 .
Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of beef and lamb was high, but throughout the period given, they decreased gradually while the amount of chicken consumed by european person has significant climb . the consumption of fish remained relatively stable over period .
The highest consumption of meat was from beef (around 220g )in 1979 after this point it dropped to reach around 105g in 2004 . lamb had the same trend of beef consumption which it consumed in large amount at the beginning (exactly 150g) then declined to above 50g .
In terms of chicken , the european people was not significantly prefer it but with time their consumption rose to reach approximately 250g in 2004 . The amount of fish that was consumed in 1979 was more than 50g per person and continued to remain around this value over the given period .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries. (REWRITE) 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e graph represents the amount of chicken , beef , lamb and fish that was consumed ...
^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... represents the amount of chicken , beef , lamb and fish that was consumed by each...
^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... in a european country from 1979 to 2004 . Overall, it can be seen that the c...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...by european person has significant climb . the consumption of fish remained relati...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...european person has significant climb . the consumption of fish remained relatively...
^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h remained relatively stable over period . The highest consumption of meat w...
^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... it dropped to reach around 105g in 2004 . lamb had the same trend of beef consump...
^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lamb
... dropped to reach around 105g in 2004 . lamb had the same trend of beef consumption ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rge amount at the beginning exactly 150g then declined to above 50g . In ter...
^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...exactly 150g then declined to above 50g . In terms of chicken , the european...
^^
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to above 50g . In terms of chicken , the european people was not significant...
^^
Line 13, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rose to reach approximately 250g in 2004 . The amount of fish that was consumed in...
^^
Line 13, column 228, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...n 1979 was more than 50g per person and continued to remain around this value over the given period...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... around this value over the given period .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90419161677 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56897569469 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6031332506 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148996805364 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822412133547 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462165389252 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108357250534 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387627855773 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.