The pie chart shows the percentage of CO2 emissions by the 6 biggest polluters in 2015 while bar graph shows the top 6 emitters in the same year.
Overall, it is clear that although China and US contributes half of the world's CO2 emissions, Saudi Arabia tops the emission in per person. Interestingly, despite being in the top 3 global emitters, developing nations of India and China are not among in highest CO2 producers on a per person basis.
According to the pie chart, 31% of the co2 emissions came from China, followed by 17% produced by the US. India, Russia, Japan and Germany accounted for approximately one fifth and the rest of the CO2 came from all other nations of the world.
In terms of emissions per person, Saudi Arabia tops by producing 16 metric tonnes followed by the US, Australia and Canada who are producing around 15 metric tonnes each. Meanwhile, South Korea and Russia released least amount of carbon dioxide which were 12 and 10 metric tonnes respectively.
- Some parents believe that learning mathematics at school is redundant and should not be taught while others believe that it should remain a foundational subject whether or not it is used later in life. 61
- The pie chart shows the percentage of CO2 emissions by the 6 biggest polluters in 2015 while bar graph shows the top 6 emitters in the same year 39
- The pie chart shows the percentage of CO2 emissions by the 6 biggest polluters in 2015 while bar graph shows the top 6 emitters in the same year 71
- The diagram below shows how paper is made and recycled Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets Other people prefer to do their food shopping online Discuss both views and give your opinion 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'released the least'.
Suggestion: released the least
...each. Meanwhile, South Korea and Russia released least amount of carbon dioxide which were 12 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93006993007 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62667247369 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671328671329 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4993539955 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113522944123 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629193737515 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477172505154 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794436813174 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328190313301 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.