The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

The maps illustrate the changes that Grange Park have been undergone since 1920.

The park is separated into two western and eastern parts. There have been some reconfigurations from the year 1920. Also, some new installments have been added to the park. The entrances on the north and south have not changed.

Starting from the eastern part, we can see that one of the rose gardens has been replaced with a cafe. Plus, the pond, which was for water plants, has given place to a playground for children. Furthermore, the seats have been removed, and there is a parking entrance instead. Finally, there is a water feature right where the old glasshouse had been.

Moving on to the western area, the other rose garden in the south-west area of the park has been moved to the center replacing the fountain. Moreover, all seat locations have been changed, so that they are all adjacent to the central rose garden. Also, the stage where musicians would perform has been upgraded to an amphitheater so they could perform better.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 yasamin27 78 view
2020-01-14 BIBHU KALITA 73 view
2020-01-09 tbinh 73 view
2020-01-06 Carry_42 73 view
2019-12-31 Manolito 67 view
Essays by user cocolico14 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, moreover, so, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47789816959 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.774664563 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.4166666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106215598623 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498718195002 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545346158609 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871686008866 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498387335954 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.