The pie charts below shows the earning money of the City of London for the years 1985 and 1995. The graph show the comparisons between earning male and female executive on the various financial sectors for the same years.
Given are the charts comparing the relation of London’s million spending and the man and woman annual salary in a period of ten years between 1985 and 1995.
Overall, the total income had double increase from the first year period, and man earnings are higher than woman income in both years.
A more detailed rate shows that total income of London City had £3,355 million which grew to £6,710 in the last period. Total earning graph depicts the double growth of commodity trading, and the double decrease of currency dealing in 1995, while banking and insurance decrease the income slightly.
Moreover, the table reveals although female salary is lower than male income, but female salary had a dramatically growth which rose up over three times from £10,000 to £38,000 million each year in commodity trading. While male’s commodity could reach £15,000 in 1985 to £40,000 in 1995. This increase also was followed by the rose of other sectors; banking, insurance and current dealing which had significant rise over twice every year.
To sum up, both London's earning and the Briton’s employee incomes had inflation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-02-06 | indah andryani | 70 | view |
- The pie charts below shows the earning money of the City of London for the years 1985 and 1995. The graph show the comparisons between earning male and female executive on the various financial sectors for the same years. 70
- Complete the gaps in the summary below of this graph using a comparative or superlative form of the words in brackets. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 184 200
No. of Characters: 905 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.918 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.144 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 9 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.141 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.441 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.783 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4