The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of citizens of four different categories who pleasured cinema in the UK during the period from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the number of persons considerably escalated throughout the tenure who glimpsed movies in theater from all the age group. The year 2000 was only exceptional with a slight fall in the figure.
The chart entitles that almost 36% of people visited the cinema who belonged to the group of aged between 34 to 44 and 44 to 54 in 1990. Furthermore, the figures significantly soared for both the groups with a slight drop and peaked the point of 44% and 52% simultaneously in 2010.
The same pattern noticed in the case of two other groups. Initially, the percentage was 15 and 25 for the group of 14 to 24 and 24 to 34 respectively. Those figures also dramatically rose to their tip point of 21% and 35%. The most fascinating thing observed for all the categories that the line patterns did not cross each other in the given period.
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 67
- Some people think that developed countries have higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment. Discuss both these views 73
- The flow chart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 78
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular among all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media website does have risks. Do you think the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72571428571 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73924762499 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1792659696 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919643008316 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338109156192 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660026064323 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669026091666 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849986286189 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.