The chart below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The chart compare the percentages of the travelling reasons and the travel issues in a particular year in the US.
It is clear that moving between workplace and home has the largest proportion of the travelling reasons. We can also see that the key issue for the travelling public is the price of travel.
Looking at the first bar chart in more detail, the percentages of Americans going out for social/recreation and shopping are 10% and 16%, respectively. By contrast, working travel is by far the most popular reason of the US people, with nearly half of the US population. Nearly one fifth of Americans travel because of personal reasons, whereas only 6% of them visit friends/relatives.
It can be seen that more than one third of the US population care about the issue of travelling price. While the proportions of Americans having concerns about the traffic congestion on motorway and the aggressive attitude of motorists are 14% and 17% respectively, the figure for safety concerns is slightly higher, at 19%. Finally, the figure for the concern about access to public transport is much lower, at 8% and only at 6% about space for pedestrians.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Alaa Hanafy | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Luta | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | vongocson | 84 | view |
- Some people think that developed countries have higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment. Discuss both these views 84
- The below graph illustrates the various roadblocks that entrepreneurs face while opening their own company 41
- More and more business as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally of socially rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 61
- The diagram below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground. 73
- The diagram below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
The chart compare the percentages of the travelling reaso...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97574680266 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8535188442 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403932106647 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174333310137 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120225877258 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279390099914 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085189564534 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.