While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Recent decades have witnessed a burgeoning growth of numerous industries; therefore, recruiting the right person for the position is crucial to the development of enterprises. But how do we determine if a person is the best fit? Advocates of conventional recruitment methods opine that this candidate must have sufficient experience and qualifications needed for that job. Nevertheless, some people argue that candidates’ personal qualities cannot be ignored. In my view, both components are of equal importance.
To begin with, the conventional approach of checking potential workers’ qualifications via their resumes, LinkedIn profiles, issued qualifications and certifications from authorised organisations is vital. Apparently, whenever we submit a job application, we are always required to attach a CV while a cover letter is optional. Without a decent qualification, even if that candidate’s personal characteristics are suitable, the enterprise will need to carry out lots of skill trainings eventually.
On the other hand, occasionally during an interview some HR officers ignore the significance of assessing how candidates’ individual qualities can fit in the company. Employers should assess not only candidates’ qualifications but also their enabling skills, ethics and value propositions. The more an employee’s personal qualities fit in a company’s culture and values, the more he or she is motivated to contribute to that company’s vision. KPMG is a great example of evaluating candidates’ personal qualifications and skills by utilising a game-based assessment process, followed by a video interview. This methodology enables a comprehensive assessment, and is embraced by many companies nowadays.
To summarise, employers should assess both personal characteristics and formal qualifications when recruiting people as each of these elements has its own vital contribution to make in talent-seeking enterprises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | elanglue | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Kanchan Sagar | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | jakirph365 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | noora.qureshi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Android | 73 | view |
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 33
- people are using more online language translating apps. are the advantages are more than disadvantages for these services? 67
- Many people believe that Social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and Society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: - thank your friend for the holiday - explain that you left your wallet in their h 56
- Many people believe that Social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and Society To what extent do you agree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.15467625899 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.89648051791 2.80592935109 139% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654676258993 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1386343358 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132852348441 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465506478297 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359656755759 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856347163255 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163345569104 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.39 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.