summarize the points made in the lecture about traveling to mars and its complications, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific reasons mentioned in the reading about mars mission obstacles.
The reading suggests three possible problems that can hinder the traveling to Mars unlike the moon mission. However, the professor in the lecture strongly believes that although it may seem to be challenging, there is a good chance to travel to the Mars planet. She mentions three reasons to support her claim and refute the concerns made in the writing.
First, the article explains that unlike the astronauts’ trip to moon, there would be some limitations about food, cargo and oxygen supply in mars mission. In contrast, the professor demonstrates that they could use hydroponic system for cultivating enough food for their longer period of time which they have to spend on mars. Also, the water that is used for irrigation and plants growth can be recycled and reused by the passangers of the vehicle. This can generally provide appropriate amount of crops for a long trip.
Second, the passage regards that astronauts would face serious medical issues during this long travel, since their muscle mass is going to decrease and they may experience lower bone densities. On the other hand, she indicates that scientists now are capable in implementing various techniques to prevent these severe side effects from happening. Astronauts can take vitamins and minerals which can compensate for the losses they may endure during periods of long trips.
Third, the reading assumes that there could be so many radiations present in the spaces near mars which can be dangerous to the passengers. In contrary, professor implies that the degree of radiation would be still in the standard range normally. Moreover, they can put light weight radiation shields for protection of the passengers that can reduce the exposure significantly.
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life.do you agree or disagree with it? 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture about different hypothesis for little ice age generation, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage about reasons for little ice age period. 80
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- It’s better to make wrong decision than make no decision at all.” Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give reasons or specific examples to illustrate your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ultivating enough food for their longer period of time which they have to spend on mars. Also,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 271, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
... range normally. Moreover, they can put light weight radiation shields for protection of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24642857143 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65633388223 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.424696556 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196386662613 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685172291109 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617915321323 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12054262796 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710212639697 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.