Suppose you are at the last semester of college and have to take a class to graduate, which professor do you prefer, one who has taught you before, or one who is totally unfamiliar to you?
With the developing of society, students have more choice on education, such as selecting the teacher who to teach the class for you. As for the class to graduate, some people have the preference that choose the teacher who has never touched before, while the other would prefer to choose the teacher who has taught them before. As far as I am concerned, the teacher who has taught me before is the better selection.
To begin with, during the last semester of college, a familiar teacher can help you study easier. Students can learn a teacher's research direction by taking the class which is taught by the teacher, and have some communicate with them. In this way, you can have a deeper learning about the teacher and his subject, and you can do lots of preparation before to help you study easier. Here comes a concrete example. During my college life, I have taken part in a study group, which contained student from different grades, made up by a computer teacher, Mr. Zhang. I meet a senior in this group, who choose Mr. Zhang as her graduate class's teacher. Because she had already taken Mr. Zhang's class before, she know Mr. Zhang's research program. Therefore, she can make a lot preparation before, so that she had a deeply understanding about the topic. In this way, she learned this class easier than others and earned a better grade in the end. Thus, I think choose this teacher can help you do an easy study.
In addition to choose this teacher, there is the added benefit that teacher can help you more efficient. That's if you choose a familiar teacher, you might leave an impression on the teacher. Consequence, you can easier make a closer talk with the teacher, and the teacher can make a specific solution for you. For one thing, teacher deal with forgetful student may asked them to take notes while talking and speak slow down. For another thing, dealing the problem with careless student, teacher might listen carefully while the student is making a statement of his question to find whether there is something has been not put into consideration. Besides, for student who know deeply about the topic, teacher can skip some basic knowledge while talking. In this way, it can save a lot of time and finish the problem effective. Thus, I would choose the teacher who had taught me before.
Admittedly, the advantages of the selection of a new teacher can offer a new chance, and you may get to know about an interesting teacher. Nevertheless, it still has its' disadvantages. You might also encounter an inappropriate teacher, and both of you learn each other just on the surface. Hence, you may have different opinion with a topic or can not understand others' thought, and end up with a worse experience and a bad grade. Therefore, I suggest the familiar teacher is an optimal choice.
From what has been discussed above, I hold that the teacher which is familiar can provide a great education to us in the class to graduate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | wuwy26@outlook.com | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...eady taken Mr. Zhangs class before, she know Mr. Zhangs research program. Therefore,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...at teacher can help you more efficient. Thats if you choose a familiar teacher, you m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, another thing, as for, i think, in addition, such as, for another thing, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7519379845 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51601071685 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451550387597 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9672940787 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8148148148 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7037037037 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270831574078 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889469514593 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073117095379 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172101531818 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669677012105 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.