TPO 41
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that coal ash has harmful effects for the environment, so the United State government ought to create new strict roles for handling and storing coal ash, but some companies believe that new roles are not necessary, and they may have negative effects. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading indicates that companies have effective environment regulations for preventing coal ash component from leaking into the soil and water; in contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that coal ash regulations are not sufficient. liner-special only use for new landfills and ponds, but we cannot add lines to old landfills and ponds. Because it makes serious dangerous like add some components to drink water. So, we need new strict role to prevent environmental damage for new sites.
Furthermore, the professor argues that creating some strict role for storing and handling coal ash may consumers stop buying coal ash recycled products; conversely, what the professor believes is different. She points out that taking strict roles won't necessary that people not use coal ash. Consider mercury for instance. It has very strict roles for storing and handling, but all consumer use it without considering about role. People also can use coal ash without considering about it.
Finally, according to the reading, new regulations increase the overall cost of the process for companies; as the result, companies will be obliged to increase the price of electricity which will make a negative impression on the public. However, this increase in the cost is well worthy for the environment. For this role, about 5 billion dollars company must use. But, for consumer home electricity, it increases only 1 per cent. So it is not paying a lot of money for a cleaning environment.
- Do you agree or disagree People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families so the help from the government is not necessary 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 70
- TOEFL TPO 40 - Integrated Writing Task 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Liner-special
...oal ash regulations are not sufficient. liner-special only use for new landfills and ponds, b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t add lines to old landfills and ponds. Because it makes serious dangerous like add som...
^^^^^^^
Line 27, column 338, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...nvironment. For this role, about 5 billion dollars company must use. But, for cons...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33870967742 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77660060616 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5650940234 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502942011548 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158345599537 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114934914634 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313866467272 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053349617587 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.