Imapcts of modern technology on socail life.
The notion concerning that involvement modern technology in people's life trigger a considerable debate. An opinion in this regard advocated by a cluster of like-minded People is that present day technology are becoming people more socially. Others, however take a dim view of it and observe that technologies are taking people away from societies and turning them introverts. The upcoming paragraph will analyse these twain sides in advance of my personal viewpoint.
The proponents of former view assert that sports sponsorship by companies have benefits. In the first place, modern technology become medium to connect people globally. However, mobile phones and internet revolutionised the way of communication. People can stay in touch with loved one's and colleagues with in minutes, whenever they want. Besides, mobile phone applications and internet websites like Facebook, Sanpchat, twitter, Instagram is way to interact with a persons from different communities all around the world. These applications offer services like text, share pictures or videos, video messaging to connect people.
Nevertheless, many individuals does not follow suit and reckons that technology have bad impacts on people's social life. Technology is taking away people from social life and turning them mean and introverts. Now days, individuals like to busy in their virtual world life, instead of interact among their surrounding and doing leisure activity. Moreover, trends of shopping from internet, online dating and emerging medium of entertainment over internet widen the gap between people and society.
At last, it can be summed up that no doubt both sides have convincing arguments, but I strongly deem that drawbacks out weighted the advantages of modern technologies in social life. Involvement in society is necessary for personal development and development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Sarwan1996 | 73 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sector's contribution to economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
- The pie charts show percentage of working adults spent time on different activities. 78
- Demand of food is increasing worldwide. What cause of this? What measures can take to meet this demand. 78
- Reasons to join colleges or univeraities 61
- The bar chart shows the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in diffrent schools in four countries USA, JAPAN, ICELAND, SPAIN, in year 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...tter, Instagram is way to interact with a persons from different communities all around t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, no doubt, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68439716312 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91553201754 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5577859818 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196360551636 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06884305955 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860176983369 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126601991499 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436910164591 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.