The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sector's contribution to economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The pie charts show the proportion of contribution to Turkish economy by various sectors in the year 2000 and 2016.
At 24% we can see that agriculture accounted for majority of the contribution to GDP of Turkey in 2000, but this percentage had dropped to 14% by 2016. During the same sixteen year period we can see that rapidly growth in construction sector and it's share in economy went from just 3% to 10%. However, manufacturing sector follow similar tradition as construction sector and gives 12% in 2016. In 2000, trade, utilities and transport boasted on impressive 14% of total contribution, which went to 16% by 2016.
Interestingly, both health or education sector and leisure or hospitality sector give 17% each in 2000, but leisure or hospitality declined to 14% by 2016. In 2000, 5% contribution by finance, business and other sectors, which incline to 8% by 2016 . While, government give 12% contribution to economy in 2000, that fallen to 9% in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | Sarwan1996 | 73 | view |
- Pie chart 73
- Gdansk jdjdjdj jsjsjj 11
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2001. 56
- Demand of food is increasing 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sector's contribution to economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion as construction sector and gives 12% in 2016. In 2000, trade, utilities and t...
^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...14% by 2016. In 2000, 5% contribution by finance, business and other sectors, whi...
^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...her sectors, which incline to 8% by 2016 . While, government give 12% contribution...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98159509202 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96067825083 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4374200766 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381791396866 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176896347332 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113561896179 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304741255627 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10374774981 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.