During last twenty years, the asssessment of students has undergone a major transformation. Many educational institutions have shifted their focus from traditional examination towards a variety of innovative assessment techniques, as they believe examination results are not often true to student's ability.
Over many decades, psychological examination for student level is changing. Both schools and universities dealt in using the upgrade testing tools than the old way process. It supposes to acquire validation of students’ ability result. In this case I highlight my vast agreement, because people’s ability might upgrade by time.
First of all, we have to understand that many ways to assess student’s capacity. In order to fulfill the purpose of the test whether that is intelligence test, interest and aptitude test, personality test, and more. In addition, every purpose has provide the suitable tools. However, by the change time, there are plenty of factors which transform people’s behaviour and condition so sometimes we could not assess their personality with the same technique. For instance, student in 13 nowadays is able to think the way person in 20. In this case, we should adjust the examination technique or probably update it.
Undoubtedly, the obsolete calculation tests have a restricted interpretation. It is normal somehow because it also depends to the environment, habituation, and willingness in the past. Moreover, people in that era might have the small range of variety. On the contrary, human today has a unique personality and notion. And I see that every approach has to be applicable to this issue if we require the valid and reliable human’s mental description. For example, we should define the type of ADHD syndrome in more detail throughout three examination tools instead of one decision. Because many traditionals just standardise a human tendency.
To recapitulate, vast institution get transform the test approach because they comprehend that the more it upgraded, the more they will find the original result. Furthermore, they also understand about the importance.
- using telephone calls 11
- The two tables show the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment. 78
- LIVING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE COUNTRY 56
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 84
- over fishing has become a very common practice in many countries what do you think are the effects of ever fishing use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...nd more. In addition, every purpose has provide the suitable tools. However, by the cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mination tools instead of one decision. Because many traditionals just standardise a hu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46830985915 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13625280082 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3961734313 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7368421053 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112790017636 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357885439622 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380732186663 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068962646534 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109645454951 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.