household type

Essay topics:

household type

The table gives information about the proportion for each of batches from different household type living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
It is clear from the table that the sole parent has the highest percentage, whereas the percentage of people living in poverty who belong in the aged couple group is less compared with other categories. In the same other condition, the statistic for people having children outweighed family without children.
About 6 percent of the single aged families lived in poverty. Meanwhile, the proportion of impoverished families in type of people living on their own and no child was 19 percent, dominating the number for the single aged group. Besides, This number at the sole parent was about 21 percent, the highest percentage at all.
There were only 4 percent of poor households in the aged couple group. Approximately 7 percent couple with no children lived in poverty while the couples having the children were more poorly so far than having no children about the range of 5 percent.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-27 LauraTing 78 view
2024-09-27 LauraTing 61 view
2024-09-03 Trần Ánh Vy 78 view
2024-09-03 Trần Ánh Vy 11 view
2024-09-01 dorae 67 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01169590643 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61563722375 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2309607869 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115986019487 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629562924068 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916004824599 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915665052053 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994813885124 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.