Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of hosting sporting events and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of host countries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that sport events can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, hosting of events can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient infrastructures, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of building arenas. Thus, beneficial ramifications of promoting sport events are visible.
From a scientific point of view, hosting sport episodes can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that demerits of costly structures are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described time-consuming events. Hence, predicted outcomes of poor host countries are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hosting sporting events far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of profitable events prove the significance of sophisticated athletes and countries, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | simin2019 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | angelstrack | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | محمدرضا سلیمی | 88 | view |
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops 85
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80909090909 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29129518077 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654545454545 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9631621487 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281479488541 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923988149002 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462821073248 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154534192764 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286391401049 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.