Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
To discourage a student in pursuing a field of study in which a college or university has extrapolated she won't succeed is a shortcut full of shortcomings and flaws. Such act might have negative consequences both for the student and the society. In deciding a field of study to be continued or to be changed, many factors should be taken into account.
The first question which should be answered is that in evaluating a student's ability to pursue a field of study has different aspects of his ability and talents considered? There are many examples of important figures in the history of science and literature which their great talent were not discovered at the first point. Some of those pursued their dreams by perseverance, despite the negative impulses they received from their school and society, and finally their talents and abilities were acknowledged and admired. Ramon Kakhal is one of these examples. A Spanish young student who was always admonished in school because of his inability to focus and concentrate on study, didn’t give up. and after years endeavor and perseverance, he introduced a way to color pathologic specimens and became one of the most influential figures in the history of medicine.
Furthermore it is important to remind individual's talent and ability has different aspects. Some are slow learners, some other fast; some learn through reading but some other would more benefit from audiovisual learning supplements. Some have aspects of disability which should be identified and coped with in a decent way. Does the institute which wants to discourage a student in a field which has chosen and might longed for, considered all the aspect the student's ability and talent before deciding to do so? Helen Keller who suffered severely from both visual and hearing disabilities, was actually discovered by the endeavor of an unknown teacher who didn’t give in and introduced her to the world of literature and intellectuality. What would ever happen if that same teacher simply came to such conclusion that Helen lacked the necessary requisites of success.
Dissuading people from pursuing their dream might also have negative psychological consequences. A field of study a student has chosen, is something that she has thought about it for quite a bit. She might have fantasized about it or have seen herself in a job or position which that field would provide for him. And now imagine a consultant without considering all these, in a short session of consultation step on all these dreams.
Educational institutes have the great responsibility of providing educational facilities for student and guide them all the way to graduation. Some student may tread the years of study fast and some other slow. Some are able to pass all the steps without difficulty and hindrance, some others might need help and assistance. I believe it is must for universities and schools to acknowledge different capabilities of students in the field they are pursuing, be able to search strong and weak sides of each student and provide the most facilities they can for the student to pursue their dream. If a student doesn’t look to succeed in a field, the first thing the institute should ask is that if the institute itself has provided all the possible ways of success for the student?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 53
- a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 83
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 12
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...uld be answered is that in evaluating a students ability to pursue a field of study has ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gic specimens and became one of the most influential figures in the history of me...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...l figures in the history of medicine. Furthermore it is important to remind individuals t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a decent way" with adverb for "decent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ich should be identified and coped with in a decent way. Does the institute which wants to disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nged for, considered all the aspect the students ability and talent before deciding to d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2781.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08409506399 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87625440226 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480804387569 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 878.4 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.289990013 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354200051506 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936864072158 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836727161097 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200670564066 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610795898871 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.