The table below provides a breakdown of the amount of different cereals produced by several countries in Europe in 2000.
The table illustrates the comparison of the amount of diverse types of cereals made by a few countries in the Western and eEastern Europe. The breakdown depicted in the year 2000.
Overall, while production of cereals in germany and france outnumbered manufacturing in Belgium and Bulgaria by a significant margin, other selected counties take intermediate position. According to results, common types of cereals, suchlike wheat and spelt, barley, has bigger production in the Western and Eastern Europe in the year 2000, than barley.
Not only Bulgaria has a small production of rye and maslin cereals ( 28 tonnes), but also belgium, that have not made any tonnes by the year 2000. With respect to common wheat and spelt, the least amount of the output was in Belgium, reaching only 1,919 tonnes. In addition, Belgium have not manufactured many cereals at all, also producing the least amount of barley, only 400 tonnes.
By contrast, 3,854 tonnes were produced in Germany, which are the most significant manufacturing of rye and maslin; meanwhile 37,501 tonnes of common wheat and spelt were made in France, that making country the largest manufacturer of this type of cereals. Whilst Germany and France produced the biggest quantity of barley, 11,563 and 11,775 tonnes respectively, counties, suchlike Czech Republic and Denmark, had almost similar a output of various cereals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-20 | koinoyokan | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 79
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts in 2012 with the predictions for 2030 67
- The table below provides a breakdown of the amount of different cereals produced by several countries in Europe in 2000. 73
- Modern architecture has made cities more attractive in the last century 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he breakdown depicted in the year 2000. Overall, while production of cereals in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Europe in the year 2000, than barley. Not only Bulgaria has a small production...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all production of rye and maslin cereals 28 tonnes, but also belgium, that have n...
^^
Line 9, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east amount of barley, only 400 tonnes. By contrast, 3,854 tonnes were produced ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 430, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...epublic and Denmark, had almost similar a output of various cereals.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33181818182 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69110487617 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2740865283 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186578228 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884066099203 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577389026897 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12896168097 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839311220162 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.