In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount that people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is widely agreed that people who do some extraordinary jobs might be entitled to earning very high wages. However, it is argued that government should make a salaries’ ladder with a reasonable cap for all professions to ensure a great fair among all workers. This essay aims to discuss such a debatable topic in further detail and before coming to a conclusion.
To start with, it is irrefutable that there is a conspicuous variation among all people’ skills and attitude. Therefore, some employees might show very high performance and think out of the box to enahncing their communities. For instance, scientists who spend most of their time trying to explore the world and finding many ways to tackle some rare diseases or seeking for new energy sources to improve the quality of life. Indeed, such valuable efforts toward the entire globe deserve higher salaries than other regular employees whose contribution might not help to flourish their communities as scientists. Moreover, paying high salaries for those who have special competences might inspire many people to do the same. In other words, these payments might lure many young people to study more and eventually be more productive toward their nations.
On the flip side, it should not be forgotten that government should design a good salary scheme for all occupations for many reasons. Firstly, having fixed wages might participate in alleviating the gap between rich and poor people which helps in ensuring a sustainable balance in any community. To elaborate, there is a link between people’ income and the cost of living as it might tend to be more expensive if some of them have a high salaries. Therefore, the best way to preserve the cost of living and make it more affordable for most of the people as well as to reduce the gap between all individuals is to control wages through a studied scheme. Secondly, government might utilize the amount of extra money which is giving to some of them to develop the public services such as health care, public transportation, education and other vital facilities that largely address a wide range of people.
To sum up, although some of workers do lots of usual tasks, I completely believe that all jobs’ salaries must be supervised by government to ensure a high level of fairness among all workers. Furthermore, it also could well utilize these extra amount of salaries to enhance some essential facilities such as education and health care which alternatively serve more people.
- It is thought by some that it’s better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside 73
- 07/11/2017A family member is coming to stay with you. He/she will be arriving by train in the morning, but you won’t be home until the evening.Write a letter to your relative. In your letter:explain arrangements you have made for them to have keys and g 73
- These days, people work in more than one job,and often change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development Discuss both sides 78
- You have received a bill from a mobile phone company for international call charges relating to a time when you did not use your phone for international call. Write a letter to companyComplaining about thisGiving your reasonsAsking for bill to be changed 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 444, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'salary'?
Suggestion: salary
...e expensive if some of them have a high salaries. Therefore, the best way to preserve th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 21, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the workers') or simply say ''some workers''.
Suggestion: some of the workers; some workers
...ge of people. To sum up, although some of workers do lots of usual tasks, I completely be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which alternatively serve more people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08653846154 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78613546882 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540865384615 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6141126903 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286339314389 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934897797704 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411217318202 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17451759887 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368057284613 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.