Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been increasing interested in online communication in recent years as a global phenomenon. While a great number of people are still skeptical about the explosion of this common trend, I content that the benefits outperform the drawbacks in this circumstance.
On the one hand, it seems undeniable that online interaction makes a breakthrough in many fields for some prime reasons. To begin with, the wide-spread integration of online technologies into human connection is effective especially in the offices or enterprises because it encourages people to exchange information more conveniently than the traditional methods. As a result, it deems to be a useful aid which pave the way for the sake of working process. Additionally, accompanying with the online technological development, several social networking websites are generated such as facebook, twitter and so on. That is an optimal way to expose to customers easier thanks to the advent of these websites. For example, sellers and guests could discuss with each other by video call or message instead of normal meetings which can be extremely expensive.
On the other hand, there is still a dark side to this case. First of all, in spite of the fact that digital platforms facilitate the communication between people, they substantially depend a lot on the network quality. If the internet gets disrupted, it will pose a serious threat to the work efficiency especially in the case of fundamental business negotiations. Secondly, there is no doubt that the lack of face-to-face interaction may result in various detrimental effects. For example, when workers participate in online meeting without supervisors, they have a tendency to be neglected by other personal things. Consequently, it exerts a negative effect on the implement of the meeting content.
To conclude, although online communication comprises both pros and cons, I wholly believe that the benefits still surpass the drawbacks of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 78
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Nowadays, mass media have a profound impact on shaping people’s idea. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 countries 73
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38906752412 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14432957068 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630225080386 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1024619044 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666824544655 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197910724396 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.018930154873 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374764735143 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100647028579 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.