The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfall or rivers. If the trend continues, the lake's water will soon become so salty that the lake will be unable to support fish and bird populations. The lake would then become essentially a dead zone. Fortunately, there are several ways to reverse the trend that is threatening the lake's health.
One option is direct removal of salt from the lake's water in special desalination facilities. Water from the lake would be pumped into the facilities and heated. This would cause the water to evaporate into steam, while salt and other materials dissolved in the water would be left behind. The steam would then be cooled down and returned to the lake as salt-free water. Gradually, the high salt levels would be reduced and the lake’s overall health would be restored.
Another possible solution is to dilute the salt level in the lake with water from the ocean. Since water in the Pacific Ocean is 20 percent less salty than water in the lake, bringing ocean water into the lake would decrease the lake’s salinity. The ocean water could be delivered through pipelines or canals.
Yet another solution would be to control the lake's salinity by constructing walls to divide the lake into several sections. In the smaller sections, salinity would be allowed to increase. However, in the main and largest section, salinity would be reduced and controlled by, among other things, directing all the freshwater from small rivers in the area to flow into that main section of the lake.
Both the author and the lecturer discuss feasibility of removal of salt from the Salton Sea in California. The passage claims that there are several solutions to reverse the trend that is threatening the lake's health. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about desalination facilities. According to the passage, the high salt levels would be reduced by desalination facilities and the lake's overall health would be restored. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects author's view and illustrates the idea that desalination causes serious problems. desalination facilities increase health risk because some solids remaining left behind are toxic such as selenium. In other words, people are faced by breath problems when they breathe some air.
Secondly, both the reading and the lecture discuss diluting approach. The passage argues that bringing ocean water into the lake would decrease the lake's salinity. However, the professor refutes this, saying that the ocean water could be delivered through pipelines or canals which impose a great deal of expense to government. some pipelines' length is about one kilometer, so constructing pipeline is very expensive.
Eventually, both the passage and lecture address the subject of constructing wall. The passage goes on to mention that constructing walls would control the lake's salinity. In contrast, the lecturer points outs that some disasters such as earthquake destroy walls. The wall would collapse after a while and salty water will be mixed with fresh one again.
- Tpo 26 3
- coins/NorseTPO 44 73
- Tpo 22 80
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 3
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...verse the trend that is threatening the lakes health. The professor, on the other han...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Desalination
...t desalination causes serious problems. desalination facilities increase health risk because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
... water into the lake would decrease the lakes salinity. However, the professor refute...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... a great deal of expense to government. some pipelines length is about one kilometer...
^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pipelines'' or 'pipeline's'?
Suggestion: pipelines'; pipeline's
...eat deal of expense to government. some pipelines length is about one kilometer, so const...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...at constructing walls would control the lakes salinity. In contrast, the lecturer poi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55952380952 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68960689707 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599206349206 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7860745763 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5625 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17184689821 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521438868874 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630264183306 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102307864989 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181736174493 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.