People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Whether people are advised to follow their emotions or their brain to make a decision is a dilemma and most people have varying opinions. A decision based on pure emotions, then followed by logic to justify it seems rather poor and wrong for several reasons.
Decision making is a skill to be acquired and practiced by humans as they progress in life. First, as children, we tend to follow our emotion as our main motivation because reason is yet to be accumulated and cultivated by experience. As grown-ups, our thinking strategies evolve and we rely more on our brains for logical, well-grounded decisions. As an example, choosing a major at the university level should be based on what you think is right for you rather on what you feel you should be doing for the rest of your career. Emotion is liable to change and so it can't be reliable to make those huge decisions in life. You have to study each evidence and reason that you think about before making any move. Choosing a major should tackle the ambition you have and what jobs are present in real life. You can easily regret a decision you took on the basis of your emotion, before asking other people in the field and how they view their career and life choices. Emotion alone is not to be dependent upon when attempting to take a decision.
Another reason why emotional decisions tend to be poor and weak is the bias logic that comes afterwards. When people take a decision based on what they feel at that moment, they try to find justifications later on to keep that decision. This process of reasoning is flawed as it collects data and justification to agree with a decision rather than study all the perspectives before taking it. An example is staying in an abusive relationship because you feel like you love the person and hide all reasons that say he is ruining your life. Emotional decisions are fastidious and irrational when your emotions are at peak levels. You might find several reasons to make your decision not to terminate a relationship that is eating you alive because when reasoning comes, you tend to find other good virtues to consider. As human beings, we tend to think positively and back up our thoughts with one-sided arguments which is not healthy for our decision making. We should learn to think first before choosing and reach this balance in our everyday life.
In conclusion, a human being is a combination of emotional and intellectual intelligence and he should try to use both to take a good decision. What comes first is thinking that originates from previous experience to judge emotions and control them while taking a rational decision. What makes a decision strong is the ability to logic and reason apart from emotion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oor and wrong for several reasons. Decision making is a skill to be acquire...
^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... Emotion is liable to change and so it cant be reliable to make those huge decision...
^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
.... Emotion is liable to change and so it cant be reliable to make those huge decision...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... attempting to take a decision. Another reason why emotional decisions t...
^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this balance in our everyday life. In conclusion, a human being is a combin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, well, while, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76631578947 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58795505319 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467368421053 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.941320165 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68181818182 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288595976901 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104945611772 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920077230085 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216485771096 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881457831661 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.