forate rle to recce
How can government encourage people to manage waste products wisely? Some believe that the only way to impell people to treat the waste product well is to formulate strict rules and regulations. I strongly agree with this contention due to two reasons: provision of laws and punishment are only way to make people take serious concern about anything and it will lead to financial benifits as well.
One of the reasons why formal rules and regulations, with provision of punishment, are only way to coerce public to be more attentive regarding disposal of waste from their homes is that not until they are forced to do something in form of law will they take concern about the agendas government want citizens to value.With fear of punishments such as paying of hefty penalty fees or spending jail time, people will follow rule as a preemptive action. In a federal state of Nepal, for instance, govenment implemented various educational programmes to inspire public to recycle their wastes but this plan did not work as people thought that it is government's job to do so. As a result of this failure, government passed another law to punish those who do not recycle their redundant wastes. This forced citizens to be more careful regarding disposal of wastes. So, rules and regulations are only way to force citizens to take any action government wants.
Secondly, apart from environmental advantages entailing this policy, a country can also be financially benefitted by these laws and regulations as the waste products gathered can be recycled to produce products which can be sold to earn money. For instance, a famous person in India named Gopal Malhotra became a billionare by converting outcasted wastes into wealth thereby paying tax to government. Looking at the economic advantages this rule can bring, country must implement this rule to take advantage it provides.
In conclusion, I strongly suggest government to formulate strict law regarding recycling of waste products due to the reason that, not only will it force people to follow law to prevent from impending punishment, but it will also be financially lucrative to impose this law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | bishalpokharel1211 | 11 | view |
- rle to reccle waste 70
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British Students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010. 70
- emission per person in 1967 and 2007/ 73
- Some People Say That The Best Way To Improve Public Health Is By Increasing The Number Of Sports Facilities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l lead to financial benifits as well. One of the reasons why formal rules and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'agendas'' or 'agenda's'?
Suggestion: agendas'; agenda's
...of law will they take concern about the agendas government want citizens to value.With ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: With
...endas government want citizens to value.With fear of punishments such as paying of h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1014084507 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75327580767 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.852277038 49.4020404114 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.916666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5833333333 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.