"Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact: almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future."
The speaker here states that, scientific theories which people consider as facts are almost always proven to be false. Also, the speaker asserts that one should always consider these so called ‘facts’ with scepticism since these can be proven erroneous in future. I agree with the speaker to some extent, but I also believe that this assertion is too strong. There are many cases in my opinion, where these so called facts turned out to be accurate.
There are many cases throughout history, where these ‘facts’ that once were believed to be true my majority of people turned out to be false. The earlier people made theories based on the technology and knowledge limited to that time. These theories, however, were later proved to be inaccurate by people who conducted experiments with better knowledge and technologies. One such example can be that ancient people believed the earth to be flat. They believed this because they were not able to see any curve on the horizon. However, later as we all know, this theory was refuted and it was established that the earth is round as proved by some scientists and sailors.
Another great example can be that people once believed that our solar system is geocentric, that is, the other heavenly bodies revolved around the Earth. People believed this because they thought since an object vertically thrown up in the air comes back to the same spot, and not on a different position, Earth was stable, and so other planets and stars moved around it. Again, this was proven false, as we know, and it was shown by later scientists that our solar system is instead heliocentric.
However, there are also many cases where the scientific theories and facts were proven to be true with the help of various experiments and also some later experiments were based on these earlier facts. Let’s take the example of the finding of gravity by Sir Isaac Newton. It was theorized by Newton that there is a force of Earth called gravity, which pulled objects towards it. This theory was proven to be true later on, and now it is used as a base in many different theories.
Therefore, in conclusion, I would say that the speaker’s assertions are not entirely true and the accuracy of the scientific facts and theories depends on various factors like – source and technology used behind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Ope Soremekun | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Hibajbarah | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | mukundkalantri | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | gabbygdavis | 62 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | rshivni | 83 | view |
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 66
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 35
- "The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life thatit has become a more important form of documentation than written records." 50
- Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ism since these can be proven erroneous in future. I agree with the speaker to some exten...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ny curve on the horizon. However, later as we all know, this theory was refuted an...
^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ter on, and now it is used as a base in many different theories. Therefore, in conclusion, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91457286432 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60203023608 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454773869347 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4714671084 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193657631909 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717535040601 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622194247845 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111677601015 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660163561966 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.