tpo33-integrated
The reading passage mentions to three theories about peculiar artifact stone with round shape and in diversity sizes which found in the Scotland. However, the lecturer denounces her disagreement for each theory that mentioned in the reading.
As a first theory, the reading mentions to use of these stones which used as a weapon in hunting or fighting. According to the evidence, characteristics like holding the stone balls at the end of the cord made the person possible to swing. While, the professor refers to other evidence that makes this theory unconvincing. In the professor’s opinion stones which used as weapon contain uneven surface but the debated stones are lack of this attribute. So, first theory will not be acceptable due to its contrast with weapon’s features.
Second, the professor repudiates the second theory which mentions to usage these stones at the measuring field due to their size that span 70 mm diameter. Because, the sort of the stones which contain sand , green and cord side stones, ascertain the weight of them. In the other words their kind have near relationship with their weight. Therefore, the ball stones undeniably couldn’t use in measuring system.
The third theory suggests stones usage as a social intention base on the reading. In fact, the complex designs on the stones balls were the principal reason to create third theory. While the professor explain two fact to clarify her opinion about third theory. First of all, stone balls consist of simple painting which cannot be related to person’s state. Furthermore, the high rank people buried in accordance with their situation while there were any stones on the graves. Consequently, third theory which mentioned in the reading passage is not logical enough and provable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | M.S 2019 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | zizi.dream | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Gh.Ne | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | sahar.Sakhaie | 73 | view |
| 2015-10-07 | ece-16 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mentions to three th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...theory that mentioned in the reading. As a first theory, the reading mentions ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cord made the person possible to swing. While, the professor refers to other evidence...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrast with weapon's features. Second, the professor repudiates the sec...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he sort of the stones which contain sand , green and cord side stones, ascertain t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uldn't use in measuring system. The third theory suggests stones usage a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rincipal reason to create third theory. While the professor explain two fact to clari...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, in fact, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70757210578 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0256495003 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362536869508 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124250000185 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647888286796 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230368736096 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646934129389 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.