Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
music has the magic power that can gather people around regardless of their backgrounds and ages. I completely agree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, although music is delivered in a variety of forms, with or without lyrics, the core of music, comprised of rhythm and melody, is unchangeable. In other words, the emotion that the songwriter tries to express via the song is not only based on the lyrics but, more importantly, relies on the rhythm and melody of the music. For instance, a Chinese can also understand what feeling an English song wants to express even he does not understand a single word in the song. that is why even a piece of music without any lyrics like symphony can touch the world and be passed down forever. Thus, a classic song or piece of melody is cross-culture and age unbiased.
Furthermore, the same melody can attract people from different places of the world and age groups by a variety of lyrics in other languages. For example, many Cantongnese songs have their Mandarin versions to express different meanings. Therefore audiences with diverse backgrounds can develop their understandings out of the same music. Some songs may have various language versions, and deliver the same message to various groups around the world. For example, the classic "Do you hear the people sing?" in the musical show "Les Miserables" encouraged the whole world via multiple language versions and united people together to protest against tyranny recently.
In conclusion, despite facing barriers such as language, culture, and age, music is still a prime approach to bring people together.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Music
music has the magic power that can gather peo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...t understand a single word in the song. that is why even a piece of music without an...
^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture and age unbiased. Furthermore, the same melody can attract people from ...
^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...versions to express different meanings. Therefore audiences with diverse backgrounds can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75552496169 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9350552177 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240132898081 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832772120655 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564081815965 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158065905808 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440934189175 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.