Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters
Do you agree or disagree
It is often argued whether poor nations need to be assisted with humanitarian aid during natural calamities by rich countries. This essay agrees with the statement because weaker nations have lack of resources and poor economy to recuperate immediately from such natural disasters.
Natural calamity often causes destruction of property, loss of human lives and suffering therefore a developed world must provide immediate medical assistance and logistical support to the affected country which lacks such critical assets. This will not only avoid further loss of life but also mean immediate restoration of the situation. Recent research concluded found that economically weaker countries like Papua New Genie and Indonesia which could not receive any assistance from rich nations suffered great loss of life and infrastructure as compared to countries who did.
Moreover economically weaker countries often lack monetary funds to start immediate rebuilding measures to their infrastructure like restoration of hospitals, school, and highways thus affecting the daily lives of people. Hence wealthier nations fund many infrastructure restoration projects which can help to bring life back to normal which otherwise would not be possible in shorter span of time. Recent study from United Nations found that restoration of educational institutions and hospitals happened faster in earth quake affected countries like Papua and Timor Leste as most of these programs were funded by the United States of America which otherwise would have taken years.
To conclude, backward countries should receive humanitarian aid during natural disasters because they lack critical assets and are economically weak to immediately control the destruction and start rebuilding measures to bring life back to normal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | vinshu koul | 54 | view |
- Write a letter to a friend you have borrowed something from your friend and it got damaged. apologise for damaging the production.Explain what happened..Say how are you doing to fix the issue 73
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with situation? 67
- Write a letter to a company asking for a refund for something you bought from them online. In your letter include :•What you bought•What the problem is•Why you want a refund 81
- You stayed at your friends' house when you participated in a business seminar in Australia. You left a file with important documents in your room. Task: Write a letter to your friend, describing the file and ask him/her to return it to you by post. 73
- you recently attended a meeting at a hotel. when you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... as compared to countries who did. Moreover economically weaker countries often lac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...us affecting the daily lives of people. Hence wealthier nations fund many infrastruct...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 937.175257732 165% => OK
No of words: 267.0 206.0 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79775280899 4.54256449028 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83235227624 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 127.690721649 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.41237113402 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7764125025 44.8134815571 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.0 76.5299724578 225% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 16.8248392259 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 4.34317383033 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201215820004 0.216113520407 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901693203651 0.0766984524023 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725296984693 0.0603063233224 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141640156995 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071940436057 0.0580467560999 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 8.37731958763 247% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 70.7449484536 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 7.45979381443 228% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 8.71597938144 194% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 41.2886597938 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 8.15463917526 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.