scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact', almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.
Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your viewpoint, consider ways in which the statement might not hold true.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whethe we should consider scientific theories as axioms , or we should search for information to evaluate their viabilities. Indisputably, many scientific theories and findings are proven to be very evaluated and true, with the development of scienct many theories have helped humanity to evolve into a better reality. Nevertheless, with today’s rapid puplications, we encounter many fallacies and theories that are proven to be inaccurate. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that we should take these theories as facts and would argue that we should think and criticize when we read and learn of any new theory.
First, it is a theory not a fact. so it is actually right to treat it as facual until it proves to be true… first, as long as it’s a theory it is actually very scientifical and objective to keep in mind both possibilities
second, many studies are conducted inaccurately leading to favored results by the researcher, so its very crucial we look at each case with an objective criticizing eye and judgment.
Finally, one might say, that if we consider every theory as factual, we might slow down the development of science. Moreover, this skepticism will limit the creativity and imagination of many future researchers and scientists when pondering of novel theories. Altough, there is some truth in this statement, we also encounter many researchers and professors who based on one research results, will travel to many confrences and talks to explain the importance of such results. Embellising such results, and neglecting the facts that such results should be repeated, is in my opinion slowing down the real scientific path.
In conclusion, academia of today is filled with zealous professors and knowledgable researchers, who are didecating their lifes for building a profound scientific theories and try to better undertand humanity with all its aspects. However, it is highly important to remember that the true science is measured by critical thinking, objectivity and scientifical input to our world and not a reckless, rapid puplication machenice. Therefore, it is in our responsibility, to maintain an objective readers and critics when evaluating every new theory or findings we read about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Ope Soremekun | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Hibajbarah | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | mukundkalantri | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | gabbygdavis | 62 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | rshivni | 83 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. “According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super-Screen produced movies that any 55
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 38
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 69
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d consider scientific theories as axioms , or we should search for information to ...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...y. First, it is a theory not a fact. so it is actually right to treat it as fac...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... as facual until it proves to be true… first, as long as it's a theory it is ac...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctive to keep in mind both possibilities second, many studies are conducted inacc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...e to keep in mind both possibilities second, many studies are conducted inaccuratel...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...rofessors and knowledgable researchers, who are didecating their lifes for building a p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0662134557 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548209366391 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0000384231 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.923076923 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9230769231 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 5.21951772744 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135017270975 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550969028705 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314606543068 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712428309381 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388448291546 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.