bar graph
The bar chart below illustrates the number of male and female students who are enrolled in computer science courses from five different countries at Canadian college. There are mainly two main programs including networking core option and database core option for students.
Overall, in both courses China has the largest number (17) and France has the lowest number of student (5) who registered in the program. Moreover, Singapore and Sri Lanka have the equal share (12) and Malaysia follows them (11).
It is evident that the most of Chinese males tended to register in database course (7) when 7 Chinese females had been enrolled in networking courses. Besides, none of French girls had not been found networking as the favorite course, however boys had shown their interests in both courses equally. Also, women of Singapore, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka were more enthusiastic about networking at 4, 3, and 3, respectively while their men had selected the database course (Respectively, 4, 3, and 6).
Altogether, it seems that the females from all countries except France were more interested in networking and conversely, men were more keen on enrolling the database course.
- bar graph 11
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 92
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?Give reasons for your 67
- some people think certain prisoners should be made to unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. to what extent do you agree? 67
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?Give reasons for your 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6834931962 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626315789474 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0186973547 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.875 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0249875671244 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0116744220516 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308876174489 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0166183014355 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287837424218 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.