Why do people help each other?
The chart Illustrates the comparison of how often population in the United States of America consume fast food. The period of comparison includes the year 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, people, who ate once fast food a week and once or twice a month outnumbered those, who consume it every day and even never ate this type of nutrition by a significant margin. Evidently, as we can see from the chart, the minor part of americans do not take junk food in the period from 2003 to 2013.
While the percentage of nation, who eat the snack food once a week fluctuated during the period, the trade reached the highest peak in the year 2006 at 33% and by the year 2013 it decreased to 27%. In addition, the major part of the population consume junk food once or twice a month has gently risen from 30% in 2003 to 33% in the year 2013.
In contrast, the minor part of americans dinner out in junk food restaurants and cafes, the percentage of people decreased slightly and then remained flat at 3%; meanwhile similarly the trend of people, who did not eat in general this type of nutrition has fallen from 5 to 4% and remained plain by the next years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | JoannaSatharson | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | koinoyokan | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | khaledsaed | 69 | view |
| 2018-12-31 | Somaye Akbarzadeh | 56 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Youth unemployment is increasing in many countries in the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures can be taken to solve it 79
- Many people feel that urban environments and more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 54
- The table below provides a breakdown of the amount of different cereals produced by several countries in Europe in 2000. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of british students at one one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make co 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49763033175 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39779515832 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6581324083 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0261528200369 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0122652632925 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197735437393 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164418801035 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165625978764 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.