The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart presents the result of the survey in a country located in Europe about the frequency of people visiting cinemas on weekdays. This figures is recorded in 3 years : 2003, 2005 and 2007.

In general, it can be seen that the quantity of customers of the cinema tends to increase gradually in the weekends.

According to the chart, during the number of customer of the cinemas is not stabilize though in 3 years doing the research, the viewers always tend to go to the movie theater on Saturday. Specifically, the highest figures were recorded in 2005. At approximately 45%, the percentage of people who go to the cinema on Saturday reached a peak. On Monday, Tuesday Wednesday and Thursday, the business of cinemas is not outstanding. It peaks at 20% in 2003, around 18% in 2007 and it just only takes over 16% in 2005. Since Friday, the data have a positive sign at 30% in all 3 years.

To sum up, running the entertainment activities as cinemas usually attracts customers in the weekend because of the limited spare time they have in the first 4 days of the week.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-11 chungoclan2004 56 view
2021-09-11 chungoclan2004 67 view
2021-09-11 chungoclan2004 73 view
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user lunanguyen0701 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...iting cinemas on weekdays. This figures is recorded in 3 years : 2003, 2005 and 2...
^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays. This figures is recorded in 3 years : 2003, 2005 and 2007. In general, it...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
...umber of customer of the cinemas is not stabilize though in 3 years doing the research, t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, in general, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65625 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65191855419 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9092418106 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106919466726 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400792086113 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469923803489 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562108340261 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027297857959 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.