In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, optimal compensation has remained a debatable issue. Some people believe that offering a different amount of salary to employees of the same company based on the designation is not justified. This essay will completely disagree with this view.
One of the key reasons for providing a higher salary to higher-ranked officials is that top-ranked officials are expected to carry more responsibilities. In general, senior officials of an office who are likely to have more experiences will possibly take higher responsibilities for the success of the company than lower-ranked professionals. Therefore, senior management of a company deserves more compensation than young workers of the same team. To illustrate, the HSBC bank offers about five-fold higher payment to senior designated employees, who are responsible for more than 80% of the company’s triumph.
Another significant rationale for offering a higher compensation package to top-ranked employees is that they are likely to develop a superior strategy for the company. Most often, senior officials work rigorously for the development of new strategies and planning to flourish the company’s fortune. As successful new ideas will possibly generate a hefty amount of wealth for the company, companies give a higher financial benefit to senior officials. According to a study on the Human Resources Policy of different Canadian companies, senior officials get higher compensation because of their significance in strategy development.
In conclusion, this essay entirely disagrees with the view that different pay structure for different-ranked employees is unjustified as senior members deserve higher financials benefits because of taking more responsibilities and the significant contribution to the idea generation. In reality, senior officials should offer superior compensation packages as they take the company to a new pattern through successful completion of their responsibilities and the development of amazing strategies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | jahid_107 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | jahid_107 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-24 | mustafamoi | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | lalacamargo1 | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-26 | Vibhu Khurana | 86 | view |
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online.Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that goup learnings process is beneficial. But, some other prefer to learn alone. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In recent time, extensive marketing and promotional activities forced people to buy things out of the necessity. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94178082192 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43583791425 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52397260274 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4167844892 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.461538462 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177749432381 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746577707631 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430434147936 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121315959097 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412747350526 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.