Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents do not understand their children as well as
parents did 50 years ago.
In the modern era, relationships have become an important issue due to its paramount impact on the mobility of society. Sociologist have been working on analyzing fundamental elements within a group persistently to facilitate forming proper rapports in that group. The controversial question which made heated debates among a vast majority of sociologists and psychologists is whether parents understand their children better than they did 50 years ago or not. I firmly believe that nowadays, parents come across more hardships than in the past when it comes to forming proper bonds with their children. There are numerous reasons to illustrate this, two of which I will aptly elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the exponential developments in this contemporary world. Such progresses, for example internet and television, have caused several irreversible effects on people’s lifestyles. Children face much more information than they need; therefore, losing touch with the reality they should deal with. This phenomenon, brings about a wide variety of differences between children and their parents, causing misconceptions which may lead to severe problems in the relationship. Maybe the only way to get rid of this difficulty is through educating parents. This education not only will provide the nice atmosphere to form the suitable bond between parents and children, but also will motivate parents to be friendly companies for their children.
The second noteworthy point no one should neglect is that children mostly copied everything they parents were doing, including their occupation and habitat, back in 50 years ago. Lately, children tend to live differently than their parents. A recent study conducted in Germany depicts this occurrence meticulously. According to this study, more than half of children who live in big cities, desire to try different things compared to their parents; However, their parents believe that kids would be more successful if they continue ancestral occupations. So we see here a conflict which needs hard work and patience to resolve.
To recapitulate, I cling to the idea that says parents face much more predicaments to understand their children in the recent years. All in all, that was a story in a nutshell. It is anticipated that this distance from generations become harsher and more obvious in near future; hitherto, the need to overcome this issue would become vital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | mohamadjhr | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 73
- optimistic or not optimistic 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for the government to spendmoney on art museums and concert halls than onrecreational facilities such as swimming pools andplaygrounds. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children aged five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math science history and language 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Professional athletes, such as football and basketball players, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
... children mostly copied everything they parents were doing, including their occupation ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38363171355 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92676777527 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618925831202 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0745151121 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.789473684 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201071862878 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579238098341 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669904013892 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124622846233 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039345382654 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.