Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Massively speculating about should government focus on solving today problems trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future has become a ubiquitous pastime of many, since this topic remains controversial and sparks heated debates. Indeed, solving the immediate problems of today seems like a sound and reasonable choice. However, the opponents still challenge that position, stating that governments should prefer try to solve the anticipated problems of the future even though those choices seem dubious at best. To my mind, being aware of nowtime problems is undoubtedly crucial and the right thing to do. Still, this area deserves further speculation and scrutiny, which I will delve into.
To start with, if do not solve some serious problem now, it could be more difficult to solve in the future. To draw a typical illustration one could examine the current situation with HIV. When governments of many country took control of the situation of the spread HIV, on the same time helping scientist to find drug for treatment and trying to stop it spreading, they save population of all the world. Consequently, If only they did not focus on this problem in last century, probably all people now could have HIV.
Moreover, it is common that solving the immediate problems could solve also and anticipated problems of the future. Generally, now in Russia we have big and serious waste problem. Some politics prefer temporary but fast decision of this problem – to build recycling plant far from big cities. However, this problem could have been solved almost completely and will not be problem in the future if government will choose other way for resolving. For example the way of Sweden in the same issue: separate waste collection, recycling, reducing of consumption plastic. As a result, government could solve as an immediate problem as a future.
Conversely, the proponents of solving anticipated future problem now stand their ground, stating that in the future problems will aggravate and it will be more difficult to solve.
One of the most their points is consumption of natural wealth which change climate. However, the development of science and technic do not stay on the same point. Every year appear new electric car or alternative energy. Probably, this problem in the future wold have been solve much more easy.
Nonetheless, this issue remains controversial and multifaceted, and being aware of its complexity might not only help an individual understand his or her position, but also support government in their view
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- The bar chat illustrates the numbers of children divided by gender who played six different types of sport in a town in England in 2012. 56
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 54
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female educa 59
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 62
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e anticipated problems of the future. Massively speculating about should gover...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd scrutiny, which I will delve into. To start with, if do not solve some seri...
^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun country seems to be countable; consider using: 'many countries'.
Suggestion: many countries
...situation with HIV. When governments of many country took control of the situation of the sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bably all people now could have HIV. Moreover, it is common that solving the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...nd serious waste problem. Some politics prefer temporary but fast decision of this pro...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as an immediate problem as a future. Conversely, the proponents of solving an...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 175, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'appears'.
Suggestion: appears
... not stay on the same point. Every year appear new electric car or alternative energy....
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 274, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...is problem in the future wold have been solve much more easy. Nonetheless, th...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wold have been solve much more easy. Nonetheless, this issue remains controve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, for example, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21149425287 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7204679678 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2557482306 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.045454545 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7727272727 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.574117043678 0.243740707755 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19058629281 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.234565778133 0.0758088955206 309% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336709881276 0.150359130593 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.306722743198 0.0667264976115 460% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.