Shrimp
The reading and the lecture are both about "Turtle Excluder Device (TED)". The author of the reading states that TDE must be installed in trawls to reduce the number of accidental deaths of turtle. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She believes that the performance of TED is not well.
To begin with, the author points out that the TED mechanism prevents animals larger than ten centimeters from getting caught and helps to catch the smaller animals. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that TED does not work efficiently. Additionally, she says TDE mechanism does not prevent small turtles, they get caught and sometimes desirable shrimps get escaped from the TED. To overcome shrimps loss, fishermen may not use this mechanism.
Secondly, the writer informs that "Shrimp-Turtle Law" was passed so that every fisherman use the TED. Moreover, there are specific organizations in charge of monitoring shrimping vessels. The lecturer, however, rebuts by mentioning that to overcome the shrimp loss, fishermen do not use TED when once fisherman arrives at the open ocean. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that no organization can monitor shrimping vessels once the boat arrives at the open ocean.
Finally, the author posits that America has tight control over the import of shrimp, only the certified user of TED-installed can sell shrimp. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that shrimping business is not much big, thus fishermen treads with fake certificates. She notes that all country's policies are different and fishermen use fake certificates to sell shrimp.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-22 | h_p_000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | SahilJain | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | wally | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-01 | ellen87713 | 85 | view |
- You have three minutes to read the following passage and take notes.In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantag 83
- Shrimp 80
- Work 60
- Whistler's painting. 60
- Weight 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... number of accidental deaths of turtle. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35877862595 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85659421839 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7975514691 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342473474104 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122926557572 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117283858176 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21313054229 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1486903431 0.0443174109184 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.