productivity and rewards
The reading and the lecture are both about the relation between productivity and rewards. While the author of the reading states that rewards would encourage the workers to work hard, so the productivity would increas, the lecturer casts doubt in each of the arguments presented by the reading.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that any kind of reward would improve the attitude of the employee. The article mentions that rewards should be linked with the performance, the worker who performs better deserves to be rewarded. This specific argument is challenged by th lecturer. He claims that employees want to be respected for their work. Moreover, he says that there are no studies shows the link between rewarding and increasing productivity. In contrast, he argues that studies suggest that there is a coloration between a rewarding system and reducing productivity.
Secondly, the writer suggests that rewards with high value for the employee, and goals that could be achieved would encourage the worker to work hard to reach these targets and get the reward that meaningful for him. However, the professor rebuts that by explaining that employees would feel that they are under control and punish and feel that they are manipulated by their manegers, which would affect negatively the relationship between managers and employees. This bad relationship would make a negative impact on the work environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th 80
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 85
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have?-someone who is quiet-someone who we are similar to-someone who is supportiveUse specific details and examples in your answer 70
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. 76
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27947598253 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71675389057 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550218340611 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3396455312 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.909090909 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254788670952 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090773669661 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737287326968 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173105415691 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679012775099 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.