tpo 19 buzzing
The material discusses the concept of buzzing, which the advertising companies have started to use to sell their ptoducts. While the reading says that this approach has many critics and should be banned, the lisiening disagrees and mentions that it is a wrong imperssion.
First, the author states that buzzers many not say the truth because this they are paid to sell products. On the other hand, the speaker opposes this and posits that advertising companies find these buzzers in people who used thier products and liked them. The listening adds that he is a buzzer for the company of his phone becasue he used and got impressed about it. The professor explains that; however, he is paid for this service, the phone is realy great.
Second, the reading states that consumers pay less attention to buzzers. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and points out that customers listen carefully to buzzers and ask various questions about prices, services and how long dida buzzer use a product. The professor explains that if he could not answer these questions, consumers will not buy the product.
Third, the writer mentions that buzzers could destroy social relationships. Conversely, the speaker contradicts this and contends that it is a stupid thought. The lecturer explains that he is a buzzer for a specific phone that he used it before and loved it. The professor adds that if the costumer use this phone, he will love it for sure. The speaker concludes that customers will trust him more and become open to people.
- tpo 31 the lines in the Sinosauropteryx represent feathers 73
- tpo 50 the possibility of sending the human to Mars 3
- do you agree or disagree people today live longer than they were in the past 71
- tpo 17 growth population consequences on the number of birds 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more likely for people with more skills to succeed. 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e advertising companies have started to use to sell their ptoducts. While the readi...
^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. The professor explains that; however, he is paid for this service, the phone i...
^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e this phone, he will love it for sure. The speaker concludes that customers will t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9496124031 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4732084041 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6068885923 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2142857143 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225065647771 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773639171474 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384416428887 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138063038972 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357970539032 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.