Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
"Everyone thinks of changing the, but no one thinks of changing himself", a very famous quotation by Leo Tolstoy genuinely summarises the evils of the modern society. When we use the term "society" we lay down a carpet of expectations, expecting every single human to walk on the carpet the same way, often forgetting that it is not our expectation of an individual that makes him or her what he or she is. It rather is the expectations of their own selves. Now, what are these expectations if we think; aren't they just a bunch of axioms everyone blindly follows, sometimes just for the sake of following?
Similarly, when we talk about laws and the legal system what are these actually: just a bunch of rule set by a group of 'high thinkers' but not necessarily freethinkers. We also know that human beings have always, since the beginning of time have carried in them a subtle hint of selfishness which only got more and more proliferated. Thus, introducing the factor of benefit for the lawmakers themselves.
Also on the other hand apart from the lawmakers' benefits, the fact that not every human and the way every single human's mind work cannot be practically taken into account. So, what we end up is a generalised version of how every individual is expected to respond to a given situation.
So, basically it's just the flexibility that the laws and the legal system lack, that fail to solve many problems of modern society. Like for example, people having different financial abilities or exposure to resources have different ways of meeting their needs but let's say the laws are in favour of the majority which never means that the other way is wrong.
Also, people coming from different cultural or religious background have different ways of living right. It's the perspective what makes us what we are of course governed by the socioeconomic upbringing or one's own way of seeing the world, which isn't always in synchronization with the existing system.
So, in conclusion, if laws and system have the ability to accept rather than expect, then maybe the world would be a much happier place just like it was once described by John Lennon in his single "Imagine"
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Susmita Dey | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Dhruv_gre | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | tulipkatie | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
'Everyone thinks of changing the, but no one thinks of changing himself&a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 525, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...hat are these expectations if we think; arent they just a bunch of axioms everyone bl...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...efit for the lawmakers themselves. Also on the other hand apart from the lawmak...
^^^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...fferent ways of meeting their needs but lets say the laws are in favour of the major...
^^^^
Line 17, column 106, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...nd have different ways of living right. Its the perspective what makes us what we a...
^^^
Line 17, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ones own way of seeing the world, which isnt always in synchronization with the exis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93066666667 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92831570854 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0566404521 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.071428571 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160832753181 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541652606952 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501548451898 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845867660088 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423013992021 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.