The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015.
The chart represents the number of people who used 3 public transportation services(tram, bus and trains) in a town of Somewhere from the year 2012 to 2015. This report will evaluate the data given.
Overall, the use of tram grew a lot and became popular at the end of the period. Furthermore, the demand of trains declined throughout the period whereas buses were still used widely by the public.
In 2013, around 20,000 people used tram to commute which later increase dramatically and ended up having around 90,000 passengers in 2015. Although, more than 75,000 people used trains in 2012, this figure dropped instantly around 12,000 after 1 year. Surprisingly, this figure experienced a huge increase after 2016 and successfully reached around 63,000 in 2015.
In terms of bus, it was the second most used public transport in 2012 with more than 50,000 passengers. However, this amount declined in 2013 where less than 50,000 people preferred this service. This figure, then increase to a high of approximately 70,000 in 2014 before it declined to its initial level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Sagar Gurung | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Komalsandhu | 67 | view |
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning money and having more free>Discuss both views and state your opinion. 61
- More students are moving from developing countries to developed countries Are rich countries stealing talented people from poorer countries How can people be encouraged to stay in their home country 87
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, second, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6616226355 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3979591128 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243445029842 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103908297729 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159161876942 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176418947675 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160269734449 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.