Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
wild life is part of this world and to save them is our responsibility but few people think that the money we spend to protect them is wasted. The truth is these animals have equal right to live in their habitats so as humans. Since we are the reason for extinct of many animals at least now we need to take care of them so that no more species extinct.
lot of money has been spent in development and technology which made our lives easier. For example the transportation we use and very convenient housing we have built for our luxury is nothing but huge investment made on human population. In order to save the wildlife we created wildlife sanctuaries and zoological parks to make sure they are in safe environments and this money is not at all the considered waste because these animals are part of the environment and if they are in danger than so are we because every animal in this nature is responsible for stable and safe life for each species.
I conclude that I totally disagree with the opinion that the money spent on wild life is a waste of money and that money can be spent on human population. Though there is a lot of poverty and highs and lows in the lifestyle of people this can be mitigated by introducing schemes and people who are kind enough to help others. It is as important to save the wildlife as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Tieulinh | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Amrit H Kaur | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Wild
wild life is part of this world and to save ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lot
... so that no more species extinct. lot of money has been spent in development ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41532258065 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48836718631 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528225806452 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.3477516587 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233277976826 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100278319458 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119710116513 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173831251113 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105535040938 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.