The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Russia and America between 2000 and 2015.
The line graph represents the Vietnamese student population of three countries from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is evident that while France hosted the most Vietnamese students in the first half of the period, it was overtaken by America in the second half. Meanwhile, Russia was the only country to experience a downward trend in its figures.
Looking at the line graph more closely, one can see that in 2000, America had the fewest Vietnamese students, at only 1.5 million, whereas France had the most, at 3.5 million students. However, the next 15 years witnessed a threefold rise in the number of Vietnamese students in the US to 5 million, surpassing France as the most popular country in 2007. The figures for France dipped to 2.5 million students in 2005, stabilizing at that mark until 2010, when it shot up to 4.5 million students.
As for Russia, it was the second-most popular destination for Vietnamese students in 2000, housing 3 million students. In the following decade, the number of Vietnamese students nearly halved to just 1.8 million. Growth was seen in the last five years of the period, with Russia's figures reaching 2.5 million students in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | Đào Phương Anh | view | |
| 2023-02-27 | Đào Phương Anh | 100 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
- The means of transportation has changed and improved over many centuries Long ago during the times of the kings and knights animals such as horses buffaloes and camels were used by man for transportation purposes These animals no doubt did save man from t 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, second, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00507614213 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61926966506 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5993092228 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243613263142 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119509247735 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625286539442 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176461268579 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632922020795 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.