The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different season
A glance at the chart provided reveals how many points were gotten by three teams over four various seasons from 2002 to 2005.
It is apparent from the information supplied that team B had by far the highest number of scores in all three years among three given teams.
After reaching a peak of 82 points in 2002, the figure for team B saw downward trends, accounting for 60 and 43 points in the two following years, then rose substantially at 55 points in 2005.
In stark contrast, it was a negligible 5 point among team A, which was by half of the point’s team C in 2002. The subsequent years, however, saw an exponential increase in scores of the team A, which made up for 11 points in 2003 and 35 points in 2004 before sliding away less than 10 points in 2005. Likewise, there was a slight fluctuating decrease in scores by team C in the following years, standing at 5 points at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat 78
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 78
- The graphs show the figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups. Describe the information shown to a university or college lecture. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A glance at the chart provided reveals h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41176470588 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50671071644 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 196.2 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0979881203 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171043140559 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986339962804 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678461848617 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115903559895 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788328884484 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.