Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is argued that large quantities of fossil fuels are used in many nations while it is necessary for using sources of renewable energy, such as wind and heat power. Personally, I completely agree with this statement because of the benefits of available energy.
There are many reasons why using different kinds of fossil energy poses threats to our life. Firstly, its resources are increasingly exhausted over the world, which leads to high expense payable for consumers. For instance, many countries that have insufficient sources for meeting the demand of inhabitants must import from other countries. In fact, Viet Nam was one of the countries that had potential yields for coal, yet it has been importing these products recently. Secondly, in terms of environmental effects, consuming coal or oil is the cause of global warming and climate change. For example, many factories using oils often release dust waste to the atmosphere; this increases the risk of ozone layer depletion.
On the other hand, the consumption of alternative power plays a crucial role in reducing health problems. The more we use renewable energy, the fewer threats there will be to the human body because of its eco-friendliness. When using this energy is encouraged more, we can reduce certain chronic diseases like lung cancer. Besides health benefits, it also contributes to the household’s economy by reducing the cost of living. Wind and heat are available potential resources in nature; therefore, utilizing these powers is much more affordable than traditional energy. We just pay for the installment of such systems, and we can use them for the rest of our lives.
In conclusion, for the many reasons I have mentioned above, I still hold my initial view that consuming untraditional power exerts significant effects on our lives and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Thang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | JayV109 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | msbhardwaj | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | DucManh2712 | 89 | view |
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environ- ment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or dis- agree? 11
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 73
- two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different season 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es the risk of ozone layer depletion. On the other hand, the consumption of al...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27364864865 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88392436143 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.856387509 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132333782585 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437172964216 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524412697519 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826773320609 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647009828511 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.