The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat
The line graph compares the amount of four different types of food made from meat and fish was consumed by an average person weekly.
Overall, it is clear that three kinds of food, including fish, beef and lamb tended to decrease while the Chicken consumption saw steady growth over the periods.
In detail, in 1979, beef use was eaten most among the given foods, standing at 220 grams, followed that are lamb, chicken and Lamb, which accounted for 150, 140, 60 grams, respectively. However, in the following years, there was a dramatic rise in the Chicken section, which accounted for around 250 grams in 2004, despite fluctuations.
On the other hand, although the Beef consumption stayed the highest rank in the first period, its figure experienced a rapid decline trend, which fell to over 110 grams by the year 2004, nearly doubled to the Lamp at the same time. In the remaining section, the figure for fish stayed at least in food consumption, which almost remained at around 50 grams over the years before going down to 40 grams in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000 and its proportions according to region 89
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region. 73
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares the amount of fo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consumed by an average person weekly. Overall, it is clear that three kinds of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n saw steady growth over the periods. In detail, in 1979, beef use was eaten m...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... grams in 2004, despite fluctuations. On the other hand, although the Beef con...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8729281768 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35438214602 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646408839779 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.2978522515 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14026185134 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709915607109 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741139903735 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993394072202 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760801322443 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.