The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph illustrates how many enquiries (in person, by letter/email and by telephone) the Tourist information office in a certain city received between January and June in 2011.
Overall, in-person enquiry showed a steady but significant rose in the period, while by email or letter query experienced a downward trend. Telephone enquiry had some fluctuations. Though the least amount enquiries were received in person in January, however, in the end it became the highest number received
On the one hand, person enquiry in the month of Jan was about 420 and it the least one in the starting month and the next following months it rose significantly 600 and 800 respectively. Between Mar to Apr person query increase dramatically to around 1250. At the end of the period, it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through letter or email queries showed a gradual decreases in Jan it is accounted for just below 800 and in the Feb it slight decreases to almost 700. From Feb to Mar email or letter enquiries were stagnant. Between Mar to May, it plummeted under 400 and in Jun it is stagnant as the same previous month and it holds the least number of queries received at the end of the period.
On the other hand, starting the month of the Jan it holds the highest number of telephone queries received with more than 800 and subsequent month also it received maximum number when compared to others while it decreased to previous month to 800. In Mar, it rose to 1000 and still holds highest number queries but the next month it was stagnant and the person query moved to highest enquiry. Between Apr to Jun, telephone enquiries rose gradually and at the end of the period, it rose to 1600.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 61
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 68
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- The charts below show three types of police reports from the city of Johnstown in 2016, along with Johnstown’s average monthly temperature. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through letter or...
^^^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'slights'?
Suggestion: slights
...ed for just below 800 and in the Feb it slight decreases to almost 700. From Feb to Ma...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...was stagnant and the person query moved to highest enquiry. Between Apr to Jun, telephone ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76079734219 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54859071278 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1666893946 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306561798014 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100716765185 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800693048652 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207005435057 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499951074779 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.